




Hussein Chalayan is an artist and designer, working in film, dress and installation art. Research Chalayan’s work, and then consider these questions in some thoughtful reflective writing.
1. Chalayan’s works in clothing, like Afterwords (2000) andBurka (1996) , are often challenging to both the viewer and the wearer. What are your personal responses to these works? Are Afterwords and Burka fashion, or are they art? What is the difference?
Not all clothing is fashion, so what makes fashion fashion?
I think what makes fashion fashion, is when you get someone such as celebrities/models who has a strong influence on others, put them in a piece of clothing made by recognized designers, and pop the image of them wearing those clothes out in the media. that would probably be considered as fashion.
Hussein Chalayan, Burka, 1996
2. Chalayan has strong links to industry. Pieces like TheLevel Tunnel (2006) and Repose (2006) are made in collaboration with, and paid for by, commercial business; in these cases, a vodka company and a crystal manufacturer. How does this impact on the nature of Chalayan’s work? Does the meaning of art change when it is used to sell products? Is it still art?
I don't think the meaning of art changes. It is still Hussein Chalayan’s work. Just because it is paid for by a commercial company doesn’t make it less of an art piece. I don’t think art changes when selling products.
3. Chalayan’s film Absent Presence screened at the 2005 Venice Biennale. It features the process of caring for worn clothes, and retrieving and analysing the traces of the wearer, in the form of DNA. This work has been influenced by many different art movements; can you think of some, and in what ways they might have inspired Chalayan’s approach?
Hussein Chalayan, still from Absent Presence, 2005 (motion picture)
4. Many of Chalayan’s pieces are physically designed and constructed by someone else; for example, sculptor Lone Sigurdsson made some works from Chalayan’s Echoform(1999) and Before Minus Now (2000) fashion ranges. In fashion design this is standard practice, but in art it remains unexpected. Work by artists such as Jackson Pollock hold their value in the fact that he personally made the painting. Contrastingly, Andy Warhol’s pop art was largely produced in a New York collective called The Factory, and many of his silk-screened works were produced by assistants. Contemporarily, Damien Hirst doesn’t personally build his vitrines or preserve the sharks himself. So when and why is it important that the artist personally made the piece?
I think sometimes artist ideas can be to big of a project to handle on their own,sometimes they need someones help who has the right experience to assist them in their project, so the artist plan can be properly executed. however i think most of the work has to be done by the artist themselves because it is their work.
1. What do you understand by the word 'claymation'?
An animation process using clay or Plasticine figures that are moved and filmed using stop-motion photography to create a lifelike look.
2. What is meant by the term 'surrealistic Garden of Eden'? and 'all that is natural goes awry'?’
My interpretation to the term surrealistic Garden of Eden is a reverse description of the Garden of Eden. It’s made to look disoriented, hallucinatory and has a quality of a dream and all that is natural and normal goes wrong.
3. What are the 'complexity of emotions' that Djurberg confronts us with?
Djurberg was trying confront us with is the feeling of fear of the unknown and the not understood.
4. How does Djurberg play with the ideas of children's stories, and innocence in some of her work
Djurberg plays with the idea of children stories and creates such composite emotions using the characters of stories. She makes the innocent not so innocent.
There is a current fascination by some designers with turning the innocent and sweet into something disturbing. Why do you think this has come about?
I think media has a lot to do with the corruption of innocents. They twist awful thing and make them look good, they attack us with so much crap, that people tend to think that unpleasant thing are regular and gain dirty habitats at a very young age, innocents could become a thing of the past.
In your opinion, why do you think Djurberg's work is so interesting that it was chosen for the Venice Biennale?
I think this must take a lot of time and a lot of hours and a lot of patience’s to make such a complicated film and get everything perfect. Overall love the creativity that went into making it, it all looks very extraordinary.
Last blog question for semester one- Banksy's work
Banksy does not sell photos of street graffiti. Art auctioneers have been known to attempt to sell his street art on location and leave the problem of its removal in the hands of the winning bidder.
Banksy is legendary. In the UK, he’s pretty much a household name. Yet, mysteriously, very few people know who he really is. Those who do have done well through the years in keeping his name secret from the real public.
Much of Banksy’s work is humorous, and others have been known for subverting the media and popular icons. He’s had pieces of the Mona Lisa with a rocket launcher, crafted his own fake copies of Paris Hilton’s debut album, and made one of the UK’s most famous graffiti pieces — the one of two policemen kissing. Many of his projects have no doubt walked the line between the legal and the illegal, and some have clearly been illegal. Yet, no one has truly known who he was, and he has been safe from much scrutiny because of it.
But today the Daily Mail published an article that reveals who Banksy really is — or so they claim. It shows pictures of his work and house ‘he’ grew up in, reveals ‘his’ full name, and practically tells ‘his’ life story before he became Banksy. The article closes with a quote that Banksy by Banksy himself, saying to Swindle Magazine, “I have no interest in ever coming out. I figure there are enough self-opinionated a**holes trying to get their ugly little faces in front of you as it is.”
So why would the Daily Mail decide to share all this information and more (given that it is true)? It seems rather disrespectful.
If they aren’t correct, what about poor Robin Gunningham? Harassment incoming? People seem to be citing obituaries that detail a couple of deceased Robin Gunninghams… but that’s hardly worth anything, because who knows how many there are?
http://www.google.co.nz/imgres?imgurl=http://artandmusic.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/071208-
Cyclo drivers, were conceded low in society, They have now become a simple artifact of the past. However, undeveloped areas in China still use the cyclo to this day, However they are now slowly vanishing in big city’s today. Cyclo was important for transportation in the past decades in China, this cheap means of transport has provided a source of income for many of those unemployed as a result of the country’s reunification in Vietnam. While in china, it is due to the disparate development. The focus on the realities about bottom people and the past is connected with the humanism and individualism, where human thinking and actions were considered the most important. In the work, the drivers finally escaped and run into the mosquito net, which is the symbol of the unknown future, thus the author explored the risk and survival of human in modern society with the rapid development and extensions. Besides, I prefer the work itself is more connected to the idea of sublime, because of the impressive underwater scenes.
The languid motion and tough development of the rickshaw-like device at the bottom of the sea is such a gripping symbol for an entire nation discovering its identity after a half-century of political turmoil. With direct reference to the impact of the Vietnam War on his country, Nguyen-Hatsushiba's beautiful camerawork deconstructs the fate of those who are caught between old and new modes of existence. As the divers strain to hold their breath long enough to propel their vehicles a few feet farther, additional tension is created between graceful movement and precarious mortality.
Zene Holloway’s breathtaking underwater photographs. unlike the pure beauty of those photos, Nguyen-Hatsushiba's underwater project is much more thought-provoking, making us think about the past, the current and the future of human and country, where the author’s intentions is well realized.
http://www.iberkshires.com/story.php?story_id=14312
